Competence, not attendance
Awards are made on assessed performance in a real occupational setting, not on hours spent in a classroom.
The Applied Skills Institute of East Africa is a proposed applied-skills institute in Kampala. We have designed 34 courses across 9 occupational fields, each built backwards from one employer question: can this person do the job on day one? We are now looking for certification bodies to review, map and certify them.
Too often, a vocational certificate tells an employer little about what its holder can actually do. ASIEA is designed to close that gap, and external certification is how the answer becomes credible beyond our own walls.
Awards are made on assessed performance in a real occupational setting, not on hours spent in a classroom.
Each award is backed by a portfolio an employer or auditor can inspect: what was observed, against which criterion, and by whom.
Short awards, Foundation, Occupational and Advanced Certificates stack from entry-level work to supervisory practice.
External certification, so the award carries across employers, across borders and into further study. This is where we need you.
34 courses in 9 occupational fields, from short awards to Advanced Certificates. Every field is colour-tagged across the site, and every course opens to a full specification page.
Every course page carries the same specification, so it can be read side by side with your own qualification structure. Here is one of the flagship programmes, exactly as it is specified on the site.
An award is only as credible as the assessment behind it. These are the arrangements we propose, and we expect to align them with your centre-approval requirements.
Practical competence is judged only by assessors who are occupationally competent and hold an assessor qualification.
No practical competence is assessed online. Online study carries knowledge, procedure and language only.
Every observation is recorded against a criterion-referenced checklist, not the assessor’s general impression.
Assessment decisions are sampled and standardised by internal quality assurers, against a sampling plan for each cohort.
Identity is checked at enrolment and at every assessment. Knowledge assessments are invigilated.
Host venues and assignments are approved for practical assessment before any learner is placed there.
Evidence portfolios and assessment records are retained and open to external quality assurance.
Learners can appeal an assessment decision, and suspected malpractice is investigated under a written policy.
These are ASIEA’s proposed quality arrangements. The policies behind them will be written to meet a certification partner’s requirements before the first cohort is assessed.
We are open to any of these arrangements, alone or together, and would rather begin with an honest review than a quick approval.
Compare our course specifications with your qualifications and tell us where they map, where they fall short and what to change.
Assess ASIEA as a delivery and assessment centre against your criteria, starting with the Phase 01 flagship programmes.
Sample our assessment decisions, evidence and quality arrangements on the schedule you set.
Certify learners who complete mapped courses, alongside the ASIEA award or in its place.
Recognise our proposed Level 4 Advanced Certificates for credit or for entry to further study.
We would rather certify 2 programmes properly than 34 on paper. The pilot starts with the flagships and grows one field at a time.
The 2 flagship programmes, Bar & Beverage Service Operations and Private Security Operations, with capped cohorts and approved host venues.
The remaining 32 courses, finalised with a certification partner field by field as each one is mapped.
Further centres and recognition across the region, built on the evidence of the first cohorts.
ASIEA is at concept stage. No course is currently certified by an external body. The 2 flagship programmes are fully specified; the other 32 courses are drafted to the same structure and will be finalised with a certification partner. Levels shown are ASIEA’s proposed levels, to be confirmed through mapping.
If your organisation certifies vocational qualifications, we would like to share the full course specifications and assessment design, and to hear what certification would require of us.
Demo interaction · nothing is sent.